Sunday, November 1, 2009

HW 16: Big Paper 1 Outline

Thesis:

Online social networking tools such as instant messaging, twitter, facebook, texting (not really online) etc. have made it harder for us to read people by eliminating the physical aspect of interaction and making it easier for others to develop a second personality.

Argument 1:

For some, computer screens act as barriers that help us avoid the type of physical confrontations we fear. This shield allows us to create a virtual identity where we become the person we've always wanted to be. The comfort of being behind a phone or a computer screen knowing that the person on the other side of it can only interpret us through our written words makes it easier to express whatever message we want to put across. Therefore, it helps to deceive others of our true personas, making it more difficult for them to evaluate us for the person under the mask. " We put up these false identities- ones that make us appear more charming, and our lives more exciting. When we talk through the internet, for the most part, we go through meaningless conversations, and pretend like we're getting closer to person(s) and understanding them more" (Andy L.).

In Wall-E we see obese people riding around in hoover chairs non-stop talking to one another through a screen. When one man falls off his chair and Wall-E introduces himself to him, he hesitates for a moment before introducing himself because he isn't used to talking face-to-face.

Argument 2:

Even without an intended purpose to fool the person of your identity, communicating digitally through just written texts just isn't as effective a representational device as let's say the earlier DRDs, such as the phone or T.V. where at least some sort of physical aspects are shown. "Regardless of how truthful we are about portraying ourselves through the internet, the inaccuracies in reading are always greater in amount than those when talking to someone face-to-face" (Andy L.). Written words don't come with a tone of voice therefore, it is hard to convey a sense of urgency, sarcasm, sillyness etc. This causes confusion for the person trying to interpret its meaning. For example, I always try to be careful whenever I'm talking to someone online to make sure they never interpret my comments as mean if I didn't actually mean it. Maybe that's why people type "Lol" or "Jk" so much, to lighten the mood and let the other person know not the take it offensively. For example, "Whatever" can be misinterpretted as anger or rudeness if an "Lol" isn't added after it.

Rachel said, " In order to be the real you, I think you need to be attached in a physical sense." By taking away the physical parts of communication, such as our voice, body language, and the pauses in the conversation, we're taking away all the factors that we usually account for when judging a person. If all we had were words, the chance of understanding one another would be dim.

In Feed, we see that the communication between Violet and Titus is more of a face-to-face affair, at least more so than the other characters in the book. Maybe that's why they were able to gain a deeper connection than the other relationships in the book.

2 comments:

  1. Hola! =)

    Your Arguments are great. You talk about something really significant people don't pay attention to. i Most def have to use you as a source in my paper. THis is really a great topic. I can't wait to read your paper.

    I think what will be good for this is probably an IM conversation (Yeah that's stalker status but it would prove alot.) Or maybe ask someone in our age group how they feel about it. If they agree or disagree. also talk about if its good just so we have both sides of the situation.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Carrie,
    First, let me say I enjoyed reading your outline. I thought it was extremely organized, concise, and sharp. Your thesis is extremely thought out, and makes a lot of sense. Your arguments are also extremely thought out, and I can tell that you spent a lot of time trying to word them correctly. The resulting product is fantastic.
    I really liked your quote in the first paragraph, “For some, computer screens act as barriers that help us avoid the type of physical confrontations we fear. This shield allows us to create a virtual identity where we become the person we've always wanted to be.” I agree with this statement, because social networking websites such as Facebook and Myspace help users create a false sense of protection. We could be talking to someone who acts two different ways, once outspoken online, but shy in person. It’s an interesting contrast, and I like how you focused an argument on that.
    I think that in argument one, using Wall-E as an example is smart, and helps support your point; however I think you should elaborate more on how it connects to our society and who we are as humans. How does the interaction between Wall-E and the guy connect to our society, and the daily social interactions between humans, whether it is through the use technology or in person?
    I also like that you incorporated quotes from your classmates and their view points, it definitely strengthens your arguments. I also like that you put me in your paper (:
    Just a last bit of advice, talk about online predators and how social networking sites make it easy for predators to reach out to young children or teenagers. As many know, social networking sites make it easy for predators to catch their prey, and I think it would be interesting to read your point of view on that subject.
    I really liked reading your outline, and can’t wait to read your post (:
    -Rachel

    ReplyDelete